AI product design agency for AI-driven teams

Yes. Designing with AI is the default at Other Land. Agents build screens from your components in Claude Code or Cursor, and Figma MCP hands real components to your coding agents.

Every screen passes a design review against the user problem, your design system and the PRD, and our design director signs off before it reaches you. Generated fast, never generated blind.

Some teams still design in Figma, so we match the approach and the designer to your product.

That is most of what Other Land does. Low adoption of an AI feature is rarely about the model, which is why it is an AI UX design problem rather than an engineering one.

Users do not trust output they cannot check, so they verify it by hand, and once they are verifying by hand they may as well go back to the spreadsheet.

The fix is in the interface. That means showing where an answer came from, being honest about confidence, making it cheap to undo, and giving users a way to correct the output instead of just accepting or rejecting it. We audit where users drop off, then rebuild those moments. On one forecasting platform that meant 83 documented UX problems and 60 design solutions covering all of them. See also our UX audit.

Yes, but we start somewhere else.

If the feature set is still open, designing screens is premature. We begin with stakeholder interviews, user conversations where possible, and a look at how comparable products solved the same problem. That usually produces a short list of features worth building and one worth building first.

It also settles the shape of the thing. A chatbot, an agent running in the background, or generative AI folded into a flow users already know are three different products, and most teams arrive assuming the first one.

Then we design that one, put it in front of users, and let the result decide what comes next.

Because you are not buying hands, you are buying decisions.

You get an AI-native product designer who has done your kind of work before, and behind them a design lead and a product and project manager who stay involved. However senior one designer is, three people looking at the same problem reach a better answer than one person looking at it alone.

It also means you are not exposed when that one person is ill, on holiday, or gone.

About two weeks after the designer starts you have something concrete to click and argue about. Not a status report, a prototype.

Setup takes one to two weeks, onboarding two to ten days, then first drafts, and detailed prototypes usually a week later.

Yes, and most clients do. Once the heavy work is finished, teams usually move to Fractional Support, a set number of hours a month for new features, iterations, and keeping the design system from drifting.

You can scale it down and back up again.

Yes. If you have a design system, we follow it. If it needs work, we make it more solid. If you only have brand guidelines, we build the product layer on top of them.

In AI products it also keeps generated screens consistent, because Cursor and Claude Code build from your real tokens.